![]() Motivation: This appeared an efficient and correct procedure. At least they didn't sit it on for 2 months, but I suppose they didn't read much of it. I got it rejected in the early afternoon, claiming "Our prereview of your manuscript indicates that your manuscript may be more favorably received by another journal". Motivation: I submitted my paper around 10 am. Human Brain Mapping: 0.3 weeks: 0.3 weeks: n/a: 2: 0 (very bad) 1 (bad) Rejected: Human Brain Mapping: 13.3 weeks: 27. The manuscript was resubmitted to another journal. Human Brain Mapping: 9.0 weeks: 20.1 weeks: n/a: 3: 5 (excellent) 5 (excellent) Accepted: Motivation: This appeared an efficient and correct procedure. ![]() We raised our concerns to the editor but they took no further action. They did not seem to be familiar with the specifics of our field, and the methodological comments of one of the reviewers were surprisingly inadequate. Motivation: The reviews made us question the competence of the reviewers. Motivation: Manuscript was rejected without much of an explanation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |